On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:12 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > ..snip... > > > > ** Plan A Cons: > > - complexity and added work of mass branch and mass rebuild > > - mass rebuild will have a moderate rate of failure due to buildroot > > differences (unshipped devel packages) > > So, I had this question: How do we handle this mass rebuild? > we branch everything in epel9-next into epel9 and build it... do we > bypass bodhi for the intial population of packages?
Yes, at the time of rhel 9 ga, the plan is to create an epel9 branch from epel9-next branch (that are active) and rebuild them against rhel 9 ga buildroot. We could bypass bodhi or we can create a single update in bodhi, all though I like the testing before dumping, in this case I prefer bypassing bodhi just because we dont want to hold off all the builds if there is an issue with one build. > > ...snip... _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
