On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:21 AM Davide Cavalca via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 05:29 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > > We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue > > 136[1] regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground. > > > > Looking through the logs we see that there are still people building > > against playground on a regular basis. But as I look into each of > > those packages, the same package is built in both epel8 and epel8- > > playground, at the same time. > > > > This leads me to believe that the only reason people are still > > building on playground is because they feel obligated to, not because > > they really need someplace to test things out. > > > > So, if anyone is still using epel8-playground for something they > > can't get from epel8-next and/or COPR, please let us know. > > Otherwise we will shut it down and call it an interesting experiment. > > Will the repositories remain available after the shutdown, or is the > plan to sunset those too? > Good question. At the very least they will be in the archive. Maybe we can do it in stages. Remove the build targets from koji, and the dnf config files from epel-release. Then after a set amount of time, like 3 or 6 months remove the repos. Long term, the non-archived repo needs to go away. Leaving it there implies that it is supported in some way and is getting updates. What are other's thoughts about if/when to remove the epel8-playground repo? Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
