On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:57, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> I mirrored the source rpms down and did the following for 8 and 9-stream.
> ```
> $ for i in AppStream BaseOS PowerTools; do echo $i; find ./$i -type f
> -name "*src.rpm" | xargs rpm --nosignature --qf='%{NAME}\n' -qp >
> /tmp/a-$i; sort -o /tmp/a-$i -u /tmp/a-$i; done
> $ sort -o /tmp/a -u /tmp/a-* ; sort -o /tmp/b -u /tmp/b-*
> $ wc -l /tmp/a* /tmp/b*
>   2652 /tmp/a
>   1740 /tmp/a-AppStream
>    536 /tmp/a-BaseOS
>    503 /tmp/a-PowerTools
>   2273 /tmp/b
>   1620 /tmp/b-AppStream
>    399 /tmp/b-BaseOS
>    295 /tmp/b-CRB
> $ comm -1 -2 /tmp/a /tmp/b | wc -l
> 2090
> $ comm -1 -3 /tmp/a /tmp/b | wc -l
> 183
> $ comm -2 -3 /tmp/a /tmp/b | wc -l
> 562
> ```
> So 183 packages were added to 9 that weren't in 8 and 562 packages were
> 'removed'. Some of those are obsolete packages like
>
python2, python36,python38, gcc-toolset-9, gcc-toolset-10, autoconf213.
> Others are module things which aren't shipped already.
>

The following statement was wrong. Some subset of that 500 may be built and
could go into CRB, but that would require mirroring the CentOS Stream koji
which I didn't do.


> That leaves about 500 source packages which aren't even built internally
> so aren't going into CRB.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
> -- Ian MacClaren
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to