On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:19:32PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > So this was going to be my next question - is it that difficult to use > C9S buildroot packages to replace the "missing" ones? AFAIK they > ought to be almost identical. Obviously they are rebuilds and they > might be a little out of sync, but saves EPEL doing a literal third > rebuild of the same content!
But to add - ideally we wouldn't need to do this if Red Hat published the buildroot packages, and I don't understand why we don't do this. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
