On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:21 PM Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 8:02 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:55, Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Current process (two bugzilla pings, two weeks total time): >>>> - 1st request >>>> - one week goes by >>>> - 2nd request >>>> - one week goes by >>>> - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator >>>> >>>> Proposal A (three bugzilla pings, three weeks total time): >>>> - 1st request >>>> - one week goes by >>>> - 2nd request >>>> - one week goes by >>>> - 3rd request >>>> - one week goes by >>>> - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator >>>> >>>> Proposal B (two bugzilla pings, four weeks total time): >>>> - 1st request >>>> - two weeks go by >>>> - 2nd request >>>> - two weeks go by >>>> - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator >>>> >>>> I also think we can improve the process by having the last bugzilla >>>> comment include setting the needsinfo flag. Please share your >>>> thoughts on these alternative process steps. >>>> >>>> [0] >>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy/#stalled_epel_requests >>>> [1] >>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ >>>> >>> >>> I prefer Proposal A. >>> >>> I also like setting the needsinfo flag. But instead of the "last" >>> bugzilla comment, have it be the "2nd" bugzilla comment. >>> For both proposals having it be the "2nd" bugzilla comment gives two >>> weeks for the needsinfo flag. >>> >>> >> I prefer the current process with adding the needsinfo flag. I think A >> will get complaints that we are pinging too much, and B will get complaints >> that we didn't ask enough for them to remember (or we were still too fast >> because I was on a 6 week vacation, etc etc). >> >> > What if we call that Proposal C > - 1st request / with needsinfo flag > - one week goes by > - 2nd request > - one week goes by > - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator > > Or would you rather the needsinfo be put on the 2nd week? > > This is a proposal from pgreco Proposal D What if we call that Proposal C - 1st request - one week goes by - 2nd request / with needsinfo flag - two weeks go by - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator I like it.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure