On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 14:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > A qui, 28-04-2022 às 15:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu: > > On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:57 AM Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> > > > wrote: > > > > A qui, 28-04-2022 às 10:48 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu: > > > > > A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy Dawson escreveu: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto > > > > > > <ser...@serjux.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering > > > > > > > Committee meeting. > > > > > > > > > > Please continue with the process for incompatible > > > > > > > upgrades from > > > > > > > > > > step 4 > > > > > > > > > > forward [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/#process_for_incompatible_upgrades > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Carl George > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages > > > > > > > need to be > > > > > > > > > rebuilt for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > converseen > > > > > > > > > digikam > > > > > > > > > dvdauthor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Correct the other packages "just" use Imageagick tools > > > > > > > , I need to > > > > > > > > check > > > > > > > > also packages that use perl(ImageMagick) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going start now ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > digikam is updated in epel8-next , I'm doing a side-tag > > > > > > > in epel8 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This case brings one question , the packages of epel8- > > > > > > > next will be > > > > > > > branch to epel8 ? > > > > > > > The way I see it is rhel 8.5 + epel 8 and centos stream 8 > > > > > > > + epel 8 next > > > > > > > , rhel 8.6 is branched from centos stream 8 and epel 8 > > > > > > > should also be > > > > > > > branched from epel 8 next . This implies that packages on > > > > > > > epel 8 must > > > > > > > have lower versions than epel 8 next . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what I should do with digikam ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The version in digikam epel8 and epel8-next are different. > > > > > > The reason is because of a package update (opencr) that is > > > > > > currently in CentOS Stream 8 that won't make it into RHEL 8 > > > > > > until RHEL 8.6. > > > > > > For the epel8 version, just do a bump and build like you > > > > > > have the other packages on your list, keeping it's version > > > > > > the same. > > > > > > I can do the epel8-next rebuild after you are done. And > > > > > > when RHEL 8.6 is released, I'll be bringing the higher > > > > > > version that is in epel8-next, over to epel8. > > > > > > > > > > Notification time stamped 2022-04-28 00:48:53 UTC > > > > > > > > > > sergiomb's digikam-6.4.0-5.el8 failed to build > > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1957109 > > > > > > > > > > :( > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW if someone want to fix it, please built it in the side-tag > > > > epel8-build-side-52356 > > > > > > > > fedpkg build --target=epel8-build-side-52356 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ugg ... why must digikam be this way. :( > > > *Sigh* I know why. It's the nature of the "let's pull it all > > > together" program. > > > Looking into this. > > > > I will try the fix suggest here > > https://forum.qt.io/topic/122702/error-aggregate-qpainterpath-path-has-incomplete-type-and-cannot-be-defined/3 > > ( include <QPainterPath> may be missing. Just add it. ) > > The fix worked . > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-62b1a9e158 h > as been submitted . > > The side-tag changed because the previous has disappeared , I think > it was deleted because had more than 30 days ... > > New side-tag is: epel8-build-side-53268
I decided to update ImageMagick on epel8 and sync it with Fedora with some modifications (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ImageMagick/c/4a0cb27f7f0603f259463e3052c4aa2b8cafec59?branch=epel8 ) so IM update will stay in testing more 8 days Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
