On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 12:31 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote:
> > We could create an issue tracker for this. Packagers would have to
> > submit a ticket requesting to orphan a certain package's EPEL branch(es)
> > and set the EPEL Bugzilla assignee to "orphan" if they're orphaning all
> > active EPEL branches. epel-devel@ could be CC'd on all issues. Then, we
> > could have a provenpackager in the SIG go through and manually retire
> > the packages that haven't been picked up after six weeks. The later will
> > be difficult if we have a large volume, but I don't expect that. We
> > could script this if necessary or just ask the submitter to do it
> > themself.
> >
> > This doesn't allow picking up packages in a self-service manner, but I
> > don't think that's a huge deal for our case.
>

After some discussion in our weekly EPEL Steering Committee meeting
Maxwell's idea seems to lead the way.
Maxwell has setup of pagure repo, to track these orphan issues.
A pagure repo gives us the opportunity to have a nice README that people
can see if they are unsure of the process.
A pagure issue also seems more user friendly than a bugzilla.  Both for the
person creating the issue, and for others tracking it.

https://pagure.io/epel/package-orphan-requests

The policy isn't setup yet, but we are moving in the right direction.

Troy
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to