I have cleaned up the epel-next (both 8 and 9) repo's.

If a package was newer in regular epel than in epel-next, the epel-next
package was untagged from epel{8,9}-next.

If a package was the same version-release in both epel and epel-next, I
made sure the epel version was installable on CentOS Stream {8,9}, I also
checked that the epel-next branches were the same as the epel branch, I
also checked to see your building style.  If everything pointed to "remove
it from epel-next", I untagged the epel-next package from epel{8,9}-next.

If the epel-next package was newer than what's in epel, I left them alone.

The vast majority of the cleanup happened yesterday, so you should be able
to see a smaller epel-next repo now.

If I untagged a package that you feel should be in epel-next, let me know
in the next week or two and I can tag them back.
If I missed your package and you want me to untag it, also let me know.

Troy
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to