On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 6:25 PM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:33 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > <domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > It would be really nice if the wording of the bug could contain some > > kind of a "thank you" note to the EPEL maintainers of the package in > > question. Not everyone will understand this process as "great, I don't > > have to maintain package X anymore, Red Hat will be doing that for me > > from now on". Some folks may take it as "Oh no! Red Hat is taking away > > my toy! Why?!" Ideally, there should still be a way for EPEL > > maintainer(s) to continue contributing to the RHEL package. > > Perhaps add something like (wordsmithed by someone > competent in such things): > > "The package you have been maintaining in EPEL is now > considered important enough to a large enough part of our > customers that Red Hat has decided to promote it to being > an officially supported part of the product...." > I like that idea. It's much more positive. A nice "Thank you for doing this in EPEL" type of feel. Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
