On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 1:34 PM Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi. > I want to bring to your attention > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1427 > where we discuss how Mock configs for EPEL should look like. > > This is driven by approved proposal > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal/44304 > that means we will have: > epel/10.0 > epel/10.1 > epel/10.2 > repositories. > > If we copy what we are doing with branching of Fedora, we will end up with > configs that need maintenance every 6 months, > the configs will be broken for few days every 6 months and/or you will > maintain your own symlinks. > > In the mock issue above, there is drafted several options. I would like to > hear your opinion as you will be the one who > will be working with these mock's configs.
Naively, I would like to see configs like this: - centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64 (for non-branched EPEL 10.x on top of CentOS Stream 10) - alma+epel-10.0-x86_64 (for epel10.0 branch on top of AlmaLinux as soon as 10.0 is released) - alma+epel-10.1-x86_64 (for epel10.1 branch on top of AlmaLinux as soon as 10.1 is released) - etc. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
