Should the first review focus on content adequacy to the spirit of that plug-in, then the second review focus on style, alignment to guidelines, etc?
If not, I'm afraid we get into details on stylish issues when in fact that piece of text has to be rewritten or removed because it may not be adequate.
Just my 2 cents,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM - RUP Team | EPF Committer
www.ibm.com/rational
www.eclipse.org/epf
| Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/19/2006 08:21 PM
|
|
… and here’s the attachment!
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 760.505.3232
fax: 949.369.0720
From: Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:34 PM
To: 'Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List'
Subject: Proposal: Reviewing EPF Content
Hello all,
Some issues have been revealed as we’ve started to review the new OpenUP/Basic content. There are some questions about what should be reviewed, how deep a review should go, how many reviews are appropriate, etc. This has led to reviews that take hours, which may not be a feasible practice as we produce more content.
I’ve attached a proposal for how we could perform reviews for EPF content. It splits the review into two specific evaluations that cover separate issues. I also made an attempt to describe how reviews should avoid philosophical debates on the merits of the content and instead focus on whether or not the content addresses the issues in the Bugzilla entry.
Please take a look (it’s only a page of text) and perhaps we can make a formal decision on this at the next F2F. In the meantime it might provide a more efficient structure for validating the content.
- Jim
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 760.505.3232
fax: 949.369.0720
[attachment "Proposed Method Content Evaluation for EPF.doc" deleted by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM] _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
