This looks like a good start. It would definitely be a good overview for a "Intro to the Practices" page I think, although might not be the main graphic we need for the home page.
Perhaps instead of "Requirements" we should use the word "intentions?" - Scott On Wed, July 26, 2006 4:28 pm, Chris Armstrong said: > To All, based on some discussions we been having here at the Agile > conference and the idea of three "subprocesses" that Per spoke about today > (and our overall discussion about presentation in the published website), > I > came up with a Venn diagram that I think is pretty compelling. Of course, > I > made up some new names for existing things, did some refactoring, and all > that, but I'm curious to hear what others think about this. If it was > thought to be a useful way of looking at things, perhaps this could be the > graphic on the OpenUP home page (with navigable hotspots and all that) > What > does everybody (or anybody) think? > > Thanks, Chris ~:| > > > > Chris Armstrong ~:| > President > Armstrong Process Group, Inc. > 651.491.5575 c > 715.246.0383 f > www.aprocessgroup.com > "proven practical process" > > Come see APG at: > --------------- > Agile 2006 International Conference > Minneapolis, MN, July 23-28, 2006 - www.agile2006.com > --------------- > 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference > Minneapolis, MN, September 11-15, 2006 - www.re06.org > > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > Practice Leader Agile Development, IBM Rational http://www.ambysoft.com/scottAmbler.html Refactoring Databases ( http://www.ambysoft.com/books/refactoringDatabases.html ) is now available. _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
