|
You’ve provided some very
interesting insights, Onno. Based on what you wrote, here’s a potential
list that we could present to introduce the benefits of using the Wiki tool
with OpenUP:
It seems like this list (or one like it)
would be useful to people who were evaluating whether to use OpenUP with the
Wiki. Comments? Regarding #2 above, is Onno’s distinction
between actual vs defined process one that we should elaborate on in OpenUP
process guidance? Perhaps in some guidance about how to use OpenUP? - Jim ____________________ Jim Ruehlin, IBM
Rational RUP Content
Developer Eclipse Process
Framework (EPF) Committer email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:
760.505.3232 fax:
949.369.0720 From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "Straaten, Onno van
der" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What helps me think about purpose, usage
of Wiki technology, is scope. Within my company we found it usefull to
distinguish two: project and enterprise. Now of course there is also the OpenUP
community, the internet public and maybe more? An interesting idea was
discussed yesterday of offering this as a internet service, so there would be
no need to install software for EPF users to have Wiki functionality. More in scope of the project or enterprise
is I think that it can help raise the ability to perform a process because
guidance can be added quickly and by everyone. Another interesting viewpoint is I think
the distinction between standard processes and defined processes as described in
CMMI. Maybe for instance OpenUP is a standard process that is described at a
more general level that may not be directly usable to perform a process, or put
in another maybe better way, to have a good ability to perform it. A Wiki can
help when elaborating the process description so that the resulting defined
process can be performed. And Wiki in this respect means quick changes and
improvements and fast acceptance. What I also like is that is a good tool
for capturing process-related experiences. When starting from a standard
process such as OpenUP or the RUP it can help bridge the gap between the
process description and the actual processes. Best Regards, . From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Ruehlin The Wiki’s purpose is threefold (at
least as currently identified):
- Jim ____________________ Jim Ruehlin, IBM
Rational RUP Content
Developer Eclipse Process
Framework (EPF) Committer email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:
760.505.3232 fax:
949.369.0720 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of "Scott W. Ambler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This e-mail and any attachment is for
authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary
material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It
should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If
you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and
any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev --=_alternative 0048F012882571C4_=-- |
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
