Hi Rajesh,
I just posted the "EPF Composer Architecture Overview" over weekend. It should give you the "big" picture.
As for your questions, it really depends on what you want to achieve. What does your new model provides? Is it an extension of the UMA processes? Do you want your "new" process editors to look and behave like the Process editors in EPF Composer?
Regards,
Kelvin
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelvin Low
Software Architect
IBM Method and IC Engineering
tel: 408-342-4630
fax: 408-863-4144
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Rajesh Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/06/2006 07:47 AM
|
|
I am trying to create a Editor for WBS and my questions are related to the EPF APIs.
EPF API/Model, as I understand (very little :) have a UMA model. The base Element is a MethodElement.
So I have another Model to support a WBS, should I be using the MethodElement as a base Class.
Similarly the AbstractBaseFormEditor and MethodElementEditor form the base classes for the Editors. Should I be extending from that.
I am basically not getting the big picture of the API's/Framework to start extending it and creating my own Editors.
The API's are very rich, but I believe lack of a Developers Guide to extend it is leaving me swim in murky waters... Any suggestions are welcome .
regards
Rajesh.
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
