Hi, Thanks for clarifying the procedure for voting.
Kind regards Jaana Nyfjord Hi, > > just a comment on how I suggest we handle voting in general: > > When formal voting, and it is a sensitive issue (such as who should be > committer, projects really being divided) I would go for strictly > committers. > When we are more trying to get a feel for what is the preferred solution, > I would opt to allow anybody to vote, to get a broad set of perspectives, > and to make sure that people feel involved. > > Now, there are naturally some border cases, when is something a sensitive > issue or not... In this case, if a committer feel strongly about the vote, > and feel this should be a committer only vote, they should be able to > request it. > > I think handling voting in the above fashion is fair to everybody and > gives us broad participation without going outside Eclipse bylaws... > > <To clarify, this voting was fine as long as no committer strongly > complains> > > Cheers > > Per Kroll > STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC > Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework > Rational Software, IBM Corp > (M) 408-219-2963 > > > > "Ben Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 03/27/2007 09:04 AM > Please respond to > Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> > > > To > "Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <[email protected]> > cc > > Subject > RE: [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle > > > > > > > Hi all > > I wondered ? is this voting only for current committers? > > I haven?t seen any objections yet to the nominations of Ana, Nate and > myself, but I don?t think its been ratified yet.. > > Either way ? in case my opinion does count for something, I vote for > number 8 also. > > Ben > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:50 PM > To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List > Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle > > >>From the list below I like (and vote for) #8. > > Ricardo Balduino > Senior Software Engineer > > IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) > EPF Committer (www.eclipse.org/epf) > > > > "Jaana Nyfjord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 03/21/2007 08:07 PM > > > Please respond to > Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> > > > > To > [email protected] > cc > > Subject > [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle > > > > > > > > > > Hi all! > > The vote is now open. There are twelve eminent proposals of how to present > the core architecture principle. > > Please, vote on the formulation you want to represent the core > architecture principle. Send your vote by quoting the number of the > formulation to this list ([email protected]). > > The vote will be open from Thursday March 22 and end Tuesday March 27 > (Pacific Time). > > Depending on the results of the vote of this round, there may be another > round to nail the preferred formulation. > > 1. "Focus on articulating the architecture? (currently on the web) > > 2. "Focus on the architecture to promote a shared view of the solution" > > 3. "Focus on articulating the architecture to retire risks early in the > project lifecycle" > > 4. "Focus on the architecture to retire risks early" > > 5. ?Explore/articulate the architecture to address technical risks early? > > 6. ?Focus on capitalizing on risk as an opportunity to advance current > capabilities in the project?. > > 7. ?Focus on architecture to exploit risk as an opportunity to advance > current capabilities in the project.? > > 8. "Focus on the architecture early to minimize risks and organize > development" > > 9. "Focus on architecture in early iterations to achieve overall system > stability" > > 10. ?Focus on eliminating technical risk early to increase stability and > predictability? > > 11. ?Express and mature the architecture while reducing the risk in the > solution? > > 12. ?Focus on the architecture to both promote a shared view of the > solution and capitalize on risk as an opportunity to advance current > capabilities in the project? > > Cheers, > Jaana Nyfjord > > > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Telelogic Lifecycle Solutions: > Helping You Define, Design & Deliver Advanced Systems & Software > Learn More at www.telelogic.com > > Ben Williams > Product Manager, Lifecycle Solutions > Telelogic UK Ltd, Northbrook House, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, OX4 4GA, > United Kingdom > Phone: +44 (7710) 637 067 > Fax: +44 (1865) 784 286 > Mobile phone: +44 (7710) 637 067 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.telelogic.com > Telelogic - Requirements-Driven Innovation! > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment or > enclosure, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain confidential material. Any unauthorized use, > review, retransmissions, dissemination, copying or other use of this > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited. > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
