Comments on the bugs proposed to be postponed to 1.0.1: Test https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159369 Comment #7 on this bug says: "Suggest closing this bug. All the individual issues are either already addressed or separated into individual bugs" So, this one should close it, not moved to 1.0.1.
Deployment https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=140074 As part of the success criteria for 1.0 we said we should have plug-ins extending OpenUP/Basic. Deployment would be a candidate. Unless Deployment becomes one of the disciplines in OpenUP/Basic itself. What's the decision on plug-in vs. discipline? Any reason for postponing it to 1.0.1? MDD https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=138867 This also would be an extension to OpenUP/Basic. Where do we stand at? What are the plans for this plug-in? Is it in good shape for starting the due diligence process? Given that, we should move it to 1.0.1, as there may not be time for due diligence before 1.0 is released. I leave the other bugs for the content owners to comment on. Thanks, Ricardo Balduino Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf) Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/11/2007 12:47 PM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject [epf-dev] Triage on bugs assigned to 1.0.0. These bugs are currently not assigned to any iteration. They?re just in the 1.0.0 bucket. I did a triage and I propose we reassign these bugs to the iterations described below, and assign them to the package owner if they?re not already assigned. Since there are a lot of these, I suggest we respond if we have an exception. Unless there are objections, I?ll move these on Tuesday 4/17. If you?re already the owner of one of these, feel free to reassign it yourself. FYI, there were a couple of duplicates with bugs already assigned to iterations. I went ahead and closed them. Close (bugs flagged as WONTFIX) PM https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146456 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160070 Move to M7 (C2) PM https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146476 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171122 Dev https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=147178 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168730 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168739 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168736 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168728 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171110 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171253 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171114 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168735 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170906 Test https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169626 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171260 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174072 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172698 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172799 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171257 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169616 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169618 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169617 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169623 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169614 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169621 General https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171250 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170354 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170809 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176112 Move to M8 (C3) Dev https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176260 Test https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176259 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174081 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171088 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174066 General https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=154628 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164685 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146489 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146499 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=147135 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164196 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=175219 Move to M9 (T1) General https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170420 Website https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174094 Move to 1.0.1 PM https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146439 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146453 Development https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171118 Test https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159369 General https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174097 MDD https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=138867 Deployment https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=140074 ____________________ Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational RUP Content Developer Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 760.505.3232 fax: 949.369.0720 _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
