Hi, i agree with Ricardo, but Ronaldo's comments indicate that we should make that more clear. I would also make it crisper how you execute within an iteration. I think we are still fuzzy around that... We describe the right things, you implement an application in "micro-increments", with each micro-increment being 1/2-3 days of effort, and each micro increment should be tested (TDD) and integrated into your build. With 5 people and 4 week iteration, you would have ~50 micro-increments in an iteration, which roughly correspond to the 30-80 bugzilla entries we address for an iteration in the OpenUP project...
I do not think this comes out clear, so I will suggest that I write a guideline on 'micro increments'. Cheers Per Kroll STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework Rational Software, IBM Corp (M) 408-219-2963 Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/22/2007 03:20 PM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> To Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> cc Subject Re: [epf-dev] OpenUP & Scrum Ronaldo, I don't see any conflicts between the management practices suggested by Scrum and OpenUP. The major building blocks of Scrum are reflected in OpenUP with different names (i.e., Work Items List for Product Backlog, Iteration for Sprint, Daily Meetings for Daily Scrums, etc). The concept of potentially shippable product functionality is inherent in OpenUP (and for that matters in other UP processes). The objective in every iteration is to demonstrate incremental value to stakeholders, and this is functionality that has been integrated and tested - in other words a stable build that could potentially be released. That matches with Scrum, in my opinion. Cheers, Ricardo Balduino Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf) "Ronaldo r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/22/2007 11:01 AM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject [epf-dev] OpenUP & Scrum Is there any conflits in the pratices sugested by OpenUP and the Scrum pratices? I haven't seen OpenUP recomending the concept of funcionality potentially shippable. Is there some special reason to this? _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
