Ben, - Do we still need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts"? I have already referenced the 4 phases, risk, and iteration from Governance lifecycle and Iteration lifecycle respectively. I also referenced Software Architecture from Micro iteration, and I could reference Use Case, from Micro Increment, but I do not think there is a great logical connection <I think no, we do not need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts". > [BW] What is the rationale for getting rid of this?
I think the rationale is that we want as simple structure as possible, and most of this material is already referenced from the 3 layers, so can we manager with one node less? Cheers Per Kroll STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework Rational Software, IBM Corp (M) 408-219-2963 "Ben Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/04/2007 03:23 PM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> To "Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <[email protected]> cc Subject RE: [epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node intreebrowser My comments embedded below, Ben From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Per Kroll Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 5:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node intreebrowser Hi, I have a few questions regarding the node "Introduction to OpenUP" - Should we merge "Introduction to OpenUP" and "OpenUP in a Nutshell"? <I think yes> [BW] I vote yes - Will the overview graph be at "Introduction to OpenUP"? <I think yes, but this is becoming a length page, is that wise for an intro page?> [BW] As per Ricardos comments, yes I think it needs to be, and should be displayed at the top of the page - Do we still need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts"? I have already referenced the 4 phases, risk, and iteration from Governance lifecycle and Iteration lifecycle respectively. I also referenced Software Architecture from Micro iteration, and I could reference Use Case, from Micro Increment, but I do not think there is a great logical connection <I think no, we do not need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts". > [BW] What is the rationale for getting rid of this? Cheers Per Kroll STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework Rational Software, IBM Corp (M) 408-219-2963 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Telelogic Lifecycle Solutions: Helping You Define, Design & Deliver Advanced Systems & Software Learn More at www.telelogic.com Ben Williams Director of Product Management, Lifecycle Solutions Telelogic UK Ltd Northbrook House, Oxford Science Park, Oxford OX4 4GA, United Kingdom Phone: +44 020 7193 7067 Fax: +44 (1865) 784 286 Mobile phone: +44 (7710) 637 067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.telelogic.com Telelogic - Requirements-Driven Innovation! ------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment or enclosure, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Any unauthorized use, review, retransmissions, dissemination, copying or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
