And is everybody busy listening to the chamber music by any chance?
So what is going on?

2009/7/1 Madhur, Jas <[email protected]>:
> Yeah
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed Jul 01 08:12:46 2009
> Subject: Re: [epf-dev] EPF bugzilla review meeting Wed July 1, 8am PDT
>
> Odd. I was wondering exactly the same thing.
>
>
> 2009/7/1 Bjorn Gustafsson <[email protected]>:
>> 8.10 AM and nobody online - is this meeting happening today?
>> /Bjorn
>>
>> On 25-Jun-09, at 4:16 PM, Bruce Macisaac wrote:
>>
>> Hello EPF community and committers,
>>
>> We would like to nail down the disposition of outstanding bugzillas in order
>> to focus on the most important bugs for the upcoming release.
>>
>> I have done an initial pass through all the bugs, and proposed a disposition
>> for most, and put "review" on those that others ought to look at.
>> If your name is in the spreadsheet to "review" a bug, please do so before
>> the meeting (ideally send me an email so I can update the spreadsheet).
>> If you can't attend the meeting, please provide any input by email.
>>
>> By the end of the meeting, I hope we can disposition most of the bugzillas.
>>
>> When:  July 1, 8:00 AM (PDT)
>> US Toll Free: 1-888-440-1195
>> US Toll:        1-719-785-9315
>> Participant Passcode: 779961
>> Conference details available on Google calendar on front page of EPF web
>> site: www.eclipse.org/epf
>> International local and toll free numbers available on request (just email
>> me).
>>
>> Please join us for this important discussion.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bruce MacIsaac
>>
>> ----------------------------
>>
>> The attached spreadsheet lists all openUP bugzillas as of June 25, 2009.
>> The disposition column lists what I think we should do with the defect.  The
>> commentary column are notes that I suggest be added to the bugzilla.
>>
>> Here is the meaning of the various dispositions:
>>         Assign - defects that I think we absolutely need to do for this
>> release
>>        Assign? - defects we could do if someone wants to volunteer
>>         Review -  need to be reviewed by someone else, I have followed by
>> who I think should review the bugzilla
>>         Close - usually followed by explanation, such as "no plan to fix"
>> (usually the bug is obsolete), or "fixed indirectly".
>>         Defer - assign to a later release
>>
>>
>>
>> Bruce MacIsaac
>> Manager RMC Method Content
>> [email protected]
>> 408-250-3037
>> (cell)<bugs-2009-06-25.xls>_______________________________________________
>> epf-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>>
>> Bjorn Gustafsson
>> [email protected]
>> +1-604-644-9051 (cell)
>> +1-604-948-2006 (office)
>> www.goodsoftware.ca
>> www.projectkoach.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
>> http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> epf-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
>> http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>
>
> ----Notice Regarding Confidentiality----
> This email, including any and all attachments, (this “Email”) is intended 
> only for the party to whom it is addressed and may contain information that 
> is confidential or privileged.  Sierra Systems Group Inc. and its affiliates 
> accept no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by any person 
> resulting from any unauthorized use of or reliance upon this Email.  If you 
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, copying or other use of this Email is prohibited.  Please 
> notify us of the error in communication by return email and destroy all 
> copies of this Email.  Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>
> ______________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
> http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Reply via email to