Hi Onno,
I fully agree with your approach of keeping language branches in cvs. I think
it is the best way to translate content (XML-files).
I would also suggest that the Wiki is updated from these translations, when the
libraries are updated.
Cheers,
Paulo Moreira
________________________________
De: Onno van der Straaten <[email protected]>
Para: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]>
Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2010 12:03:31
Assunto: Re: [epf-dev] Notes from January 14, 2010 EPF Project Release
Planning call
Hi Everyone,
Regarding the translation effort, I think we should consider harvesting what is
up in the Wiki into a proper translated EPF Practices library. We started the
translation effort a long time ago already but my assumption has always been
that this would end op in a library one fine day.
RMC has some export/import functionality I think for supporting translations.
Can we use that? The procedure is to export to HTML files which we could
translate and then import back. I'm not sure about this as I have never used
this. But I think this is not the right approach as RMC is a commercial product
and with this approach we would not have any other way than with RMC to
maintain the translations.
IMHO the RMC approach is not fundamentally different from creating and
maintaining language 'branches' in our CVS repository and then translating the
XML-files directly and/or through EPF. Editing HTML does of course offer a
different experience to editing XML. And everything will be version controlled
so we should be able to recover from big mishaps.
This will require of course a some effort but after the library is completely
translated it will be matter of processing the delta's from time to time. A
good SCM and some diff tools will make this doable?
Do we consider a proper translated library a proper, worthwhile objective for
2010? Can we live with the branching and XML editing approach I'm proposing? If
we do, I'm willing to investigate this a little further to get a better feel of
what is required/involved.
Best Regards,
Onno
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Sibbald <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Here are my notes from the subject call.
> Those of you that were on the call could you please:
>
>1) Review the notes and let us know
>if you note any significant errors or omissions
>2) Ensure the list of attendees is correct
>3) Reply to [email protected] >so I have you email address for future
>distribution of draft minutes for
>review prior to sending to the mailing list (and for other one-one
>communications)
>
>
>
>
>Thanks for attending the call. I
>think there are some exciting plans for EPF in 2010 and I am looking forward
>to working with all of you.
>
>Cheers,
>>Chris
>
>Chris Sibbald, Ph.D., P.Eng.
>>Senior Systems Engineer
>>Mobile: +1 (613) 266 - 5061
>>Fax: +1 (613) 739 - 4786
>[email protected]
>_______________________________________________
>>epf-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
