Dear List, We're looking to "beef up" OpenUP a bit, primarily to get more model oriented focus into the process as well as a stronger reqs management, change mgmt etc. It would probably be fair to say something a bit closer to "RUP for small projects" would suite us without loosing some of the UPF goodness (e.g. practices, EPF community content too).
We came across the following archived EPF-dev post: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg00525.html Which states: *>So you're an EPF author, and you need to write a guideline or concept. >You know that there is some material in RUP that you'd like to copy, >but unfortunately, that material belongs to IBM. > >Good news! As part of the OpenUP donation, IBM donated small project >RUP content as source material for authors to use. >You can download it here: > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.epf/additional/?cvsroot=Technology_Project#RUP%204%20small%20projects%20config.zip > >This is not a working RUP configuration. It is intended only as source >material to be reworked into OpenUP/Basic. * Has anyone got anything more concrete regarding this? Can anyone point me to or advise me how I validate this assertion? Thanks, John
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
