On 3/2/06, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/2/06, Kristoffer Lundén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hiding the statusbar seems like a > > huge mistake though, how then to verify suspect links? > > So come up with a better way to do it. :) Eh.. a better way than removing it? Keeping it, of course! Or if you meant come up with something better that the statusbar, I don't think that is my job. That would be the job of whoever wants it removed - I think it's fine. >The information could be in > the mouseover popup; i could only come up when the target link in some > way doesn't match the text of the link; How could that possibly be decided? If a link says "Go to paypal" and the link is "paypal.bleh.com" instead of "www.paypal.com" a human can easily see that something is wrong, but a computer? And if the link text says "Gimme!" instead with the same links? > there are a million potential > ways to do this, Examples? Apart from the popup above, that I think is practically impossible? If there is no regression in safety and simplicity of use, you can remove/replace anything you like. I'm not against change, just bad change. :) >all less crappy than the statusbar (which gedit has > wisely basically gotten rid of.) > What's so crappy about the statusbar? It's an excellent place to show extra information and it isn't like it takes up tons of space or anything. -- Kristoffer -- Kristoffer Lundén ✉ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ✉ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gamemaker.nu/ ☎ 0704 48 98 77
_______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
