Adam Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-21-06 at 13:33 +0300, Timo Hirvonen wrote: > > > Currently adblock is _hard_ to use because it just never can't work > > properly without configuration. I was annoyed when I saw the "it just > > works" advertisement and it just didn't work. > > Haha, where? I'm pretty sure I only ever said "it's *supposed* to 'Just > Work'" and I'm the one who wrote it ;). (I never finished it, and I > certainly won't get a chance this summer.)
My memory isn't very good, sorry. It wasn't official epiphany page where I read it: http://ploum.frimouvy.org/?2006/03/15/100-why-you-should-try-epiphany-as-your-default-browser-with-gnome-214 "Enable the ad blocker extension and enjoy, without any further configuration, lighter and faster web pages." Thanks for the extension. > It would work a lot better if one of the Epiphany devs ran the update > script in the epiphany-extensions/extensions/adblock directory, and then > distributed the resulting blacklist. (The blacklist only works when it's > updated frequently, and I never automated its distribution in any way.) It will never work perfectly. You'd have to add millions of lines to the blacklist. I was lazy and added these to my blacklist: google-analytics\. /banners/ /banner\? /ads/ /sponsors/ Probably won't be good idea to include these in Epiphany's defaults, it would likely block too much ;) -- http://onion.dynserv.net/~timo/ _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
