On 6/23/06, Adam Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan: are there any aspects of the extensions system you found weak or > lacking? That includes documentation, API, online help you used (e.g., > IRC, mailing lists, ...), etc. What could have been done to save you > more time and/or make writing extensions easier? If you've developed > Firefox extensions before, how did the experience compare?
Having not developed any yet (and not being Stefan), I can't say completely, but even though I know PyGTK+ fairly well, I had a hard time getting anywhere in the limited time I've been able to spend on it. I felt like the docs could've used a few more examples (maybe some example code blocks from existing extensions?). The PyGTK+ tutorial is an example of something that really helped me. Perhaps if I could grok the C API I'd be in better shape, but alas. Is this mailing list the place to ask questions about developing? I find that I work better when I'm constantly getting feedback and discussing. (Maybe that's just a lack of skill.) > Anyone: there (finally) seem to be quite a few unofficial Epiphany > extensions floating around. Is there a page somewhere on which to list > them? (Maybe a wiki page.) I remember Firefox has a big extensions page > somewhere; we should try to compete. Agreed; I've found random things on Bugzilla but there seems to be no central place. Maybe the wiki [1] though I'm not sure it'd be suitable for uploading files. Anyway, Epiphany is nice! I'm looking to make tab navigation a bit easier with a navigation like Opera or the Firefox extension LastTab. (Speak up if you'd like to work together.) Cheers, Andrew Conkling [1] http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
