Em Sex, 2006-10-20 às 17:09 -0400, Adam Hooper escreveu: > On Fri, 2006-20-10 at 20:10 +0000, Jason Spiro wrote: > > Jason Spiro <jasonspiro4+news <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > I filed a bug at http://bugs.debian.org/393521 - no response yet; we > > > will see what happens. > > > > One of the Debian maintainers replied. He thinks it would be confusing for > > those > > who have the game installed to rename the package to epiphany-game. He also > > is a > > big fan of the game and believes that having it named epiphany is a good > > way of > > making more people discover the game. Although that is true, I still hope > > Debian > > will rename Epiphany. > > > > If you use Debian and want to join the bug discussion, send comments to > > 393521@ > > bugs.debian.org and they will be added to the thread. > > Yet the only numbers he can find (which you mentioned in your bug > report) prove exactly the opposite of what he argues. He has no basis > for argument :). > > I suggest you just file the same bug against Ubuntu. Ubuntu developers > are far more likely to care about Epiphany-the-browser (they came > extremely close to making it their default), and I find stuff gets done > in Ubuntu way faster than in Debian :). >
It's less important on Ubuntu, because: 1) users are more likely to use Synaptic or gnome-app-install, which are installed by default. On both these programs you can't really install a package without reading its description; 2) epiphany (the game) is in the universe repository, which is not enabled by default. The chances of installing the game instead of the browser are zero on a default install. It should also be mentioned that Debian installs Epiphany by default if you select the "desktop" task. Cheers, Evandro _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
