Hi all, I'd like to get a bit of discussion going about this request.
What do the list members think Epiphany 2.20 should be like, compared to 2.18? I'd like to provide a more elaborate answer to Lucas' question than "we don't really have a plan". Please be realistic here, because as you probably know there is very little developer manpower at the moment. We do have a promising Summer of Code project[1] but we shouldn't depend on this being ready for 2.20. To give you a bit of a sense of direction, you could have a look at the current untriaged patches in bugzilla[2]. Which are useful, which require work? Can they be applied to SVN trunk? The current 2.18 roadmap page [3] may provide some inspiration as well. For example, the download integration with Nautilus was nearly ready but it has fallen through on a failed assumption that Mathusalem (long running task manager) would be included into GNOME. What are we going to do with it? Hoping for a constructive discussion, -- Reinout van Schouwen [1] http://code.google.com/soc/gnome/appinfo.html?csaid=C228E14687A8C2D4 [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/patch-report.cgi?product=epiphany&patch-status=none [3] http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany/RoadMap218 _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
