2008/11/20 Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Fabio Rafael da Rosa > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Em Qui, 2008-11-20 às 12:01 +0000, Magnus Therning escreveu: > >> I would personally consider using the password store to retrieve the > >> password (either from epiphany's password store or the Gnome Keyring) > >> for google bookmarks rather than pull in the cookie from the browser. > >> Requiring that the user has logged in (i.e. that there is a cookie) > >> doesn't feel right to me. This is the direction I'm planning to take > >> epilicious in, as soon as I find some inspiration and spare time :-) > > The whole idea of using the cookie (or better, exposing the cookie in an > > easy way for other plugins to consume) is to provide a better experience > > for people that uses lots of google services. Google provides a 'Single > > Sign On' mechanism for it's services, and I think that, if the idea is > > to 'merge' epiphany on the cloud, that the way to go (for google). ON > > the future, it will be possible to implement more google-based plugins, > > all using the same login (instead of requiring a separete login/pass for > > each service). I personally think that this way we can provide a better > > experience to the user. > > If single-sign-on is what you want then you really ought to use Gnome > Keyring, pull out the Google password and then push the cookie into > epiphany. It _ought_ to be simple ;-) > > >> Do you have good documentation for the google bookmarks API? Last > >> time I looked there wasn't anything offical from Google. I managed to > >> track down something based on a reverse-engineering effort (I think) > >> but then ran out of time/steam and didn't put it in epilicious. > > No , I don't. Google did not release any official documentation for > > google bookmarks. But, it is quite easy to use (I did the same as you > > for finding the API). > > > > I like epilicious and del.icio.us , but, we don't have an alternative > > for people that _dont_ use delicious. I know lots of people that don't > > use epiphany mainly because it does not have google toolbar. I like the > > idea of integrating google services with the browser, I personally use a > > lot of them, and that would make my life easier, and, I think, that's > > the main point for GNOME and that's why I like epiphany: keep it simple > > and easy . That's my target audience. > > I should point out that despite the name epilicious no longer supports > del.icio.us, its API was too flakey to support in the end. Currently > it only has ma.gnolia support. > > Personally I don't use any Google services that I want browser support > for so I'm clearly not in the target audience for this :-) > > /M > > -- > Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) > magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org > http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe > _______________________________________________ > epiphany-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list >
Wouldn't Mozilla Weave be the natural choice, it being open and all, and allowing people to run their own servers?
_______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
