Le mardi 02 décembre 2008, à 15:05 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit : > Hi; > > Le Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:23:29 +0100, > Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > We have a patch in openSUSE for > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444682 > > I must admit I'm blindly trusting Wolfgang here, but if it's just for > > proxy settings and if xulrunner 1.9 reads proxy settings from gconf, > > that should be fine. > > The proxy does indeed seem to be taken from GConf through other means > in gecko 1.9 (nsUnixSystemProxySettings.cpp), so the patch looks ok to > me. If you can confirm that with a non-suse xulrunner (e.g. ubuntu's), > it's ok to commit the patch with a checkin comment explaining the > issue.
Well I've tested it there and it works too. But I don't have a proxy so, not sure the test is relevant... If you think it is, I'll commit. > I'm rather unsatisfied with the cited bug report though; there's no > explanation at all how setting a pref in one xulrunner-using > application with its own profile could affect the running instance of > firefox et al. > > As near as I could find, this is caused by a non-standard > patch in suse's xulrunner package (mozilla-nss-shared-db.patch), but > even then this should only affect the NSS db, not the cookies db. Also > there's no explanation _how_ setting this specific pref causes the bug. Thanks, I'll forward your comment! Wolfgang may send more details about all this. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
