On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Xan Lopez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm guessing the 'big question' is whether or not webkit is accepted >> as a dependency in GNOME? In that case that topic wasn't in the agenda >> for the simple reason that it's not in our hands to decide that. As >> Vincent has said, though, what we discussed can be used by the release >> team as input to decide on this. >> > > That seems backwards to me. We can't decree if there will be a working > epiphany/webkit release in time for 2.26... > Will there ? >
AFAIK whether or not to accept WebKit as a dependency is not only related to whether or not there will be a "working" epiphany release at the same time. There's other modules planning to move from gecko to webkit, and I think that for all of them WebKit is already good enough minus the a11y regression (that's why this is a blocker). In any case, the current plan for Epiphany is to release some kind of alpha/beta version of the webkit port at the same time than 2.26, and declare it stable or good enough by 2.28, but as with any other volunteer-based project this can wildly fluctuate depending on what people actually end up doing (that being said, I'm happy with the major progress in the last two or three months). Cheers, Xan _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
