A) I see a problem. B) Ask me if I care. A) You might, if you knew more. B) Try me. . . . B) I've heard enough, I can't make heads nor tails of it, go away. A) If you reasoned better, then you would understand. B) You say I'm stupid!? A) Well, I could teach you how to understand what I am saying. It will take a while. B) Got unlimited long distance? A) Yes, why? B) Make random calls until you find someone who cares. BYE! . . . . A) Hello? I see a problem.
The question which I pose to the group regards the ethics of communication. At what point does the obligation to tell the truth shift from the source to the receiver. In other words, is the source obligated to relentlessly pursue receivers until finally the truth is understood? Lonnie Courtney Clay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/hXYGkvShuRIJ. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
