So from did the particles come to converge at a point to cause the big bang? Particles must have existed and occupied some space before embarking on a convergence. We may end up with ring theory or a chicken and egg metaphor. Did Big Bang create particles or particles converged and BigBanged? Mike Atovigba.
On 9/8/12, epistemology@googlegroups.com <epistemology@googlegroups.com> wrote: > ============================================================================= > Today's Topic Summary > ============================================================================= > > Group: epistemology@googlegroups.com > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - Our Modern Scientific Philosophy. [1 Update] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/d1756df8ba774b71 > - The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass [2 Updates] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/a9aeae524a34409a > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: Our Modern Scientific Philosophy. > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/d1756df8ba774b71 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 1 ---------- > From: "socra...@bezeqint.net" <socra...@bezeqint.net> > Date: Sep 08 08:15AM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/20d98ab532653d23 > > Our Modern Scientific Philosophy. > =. > The simplest atom hydrogen consists of electron and proton. > Question. > Where did electron and proton come from? > Answer. > Electron and proton came from big bang. > Question. > Where the did big bang come from? > Answer. > The big bang was created when all electrons and protons > and all another particles were pressed into a singular point. > ==.. > If you don’t believe in such philosophy – you are an ignorant man. > =. > > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/a9aeae524a34409a > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 2 ---------- > From: archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> > Date: Sep 07 08:05PM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/a98898979956020e > > There's a maths theory that challenges one conservation law we're all > used to. The full paper is at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.5078v2.pdf > and it's by Ma and Wang. In a sense they rework Einstein to account > for dark energy and matter. The paper concludes: > > Fifth, the scalar curvature R of space-time obeys: > R = > 8πG > c3 T + . > Consequently, when there is no normal matter present (with T = 0), the > curvature > R of space-time is balanced by R = . Therefore, there is no real > vacuum in the > universe. > > The familiar equation corrupts in cut and paste. The last line is of > interest.. > > It also seems hey claim: > > that the energy-momentum tensor of normal matter is no longer > conserved and that new gravitational field equations follow from > Einstein's principles of equivalence and general relativity, and the > principle of Lagrangian dynamics, just as Einstein derived his field > equations. Wang says the new equations were the unique outcome of the > non-conservation of the energy-momentum tensor of normal matter. > > On 31 Aug, 05:47, "socra...@bezeqint.net" <socra...@bezeqint.net> > wrote: > > > ---------- 2 of 2 ---------- > From: "socra...@bezeqint.net" <socra...@bezeqint.net> > Date: Sep 08 01:29AM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/bde1040b5155e9b9 > > We are setting limits on things that we don’t have > a clue about ( for example: c=1, T=0K ) . > From these two parameters (c=1, T=0K ) was started > all modern speculations in Physics ( SRT, QT, GRT ). > > ==. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
