This topic is interesting to me as a Tivman from Nigeria. This is because,
the Tiv have the same word for time and space. Both are called IAN or SHIE
- 'Ian' is meant originally to be space but 'Ian' also means time.
Similarly, 'Shie' is meant originally to be time but 'Shie' also means
space. Hence, 'Ian = 'Shie' in Tiv equation. Does it mean then that our
forefathers had the sense of time and space without documenting it? As far
as I am concerned, and from the Tivman's point of view, time and space mean
the same thing. When I attempted resolving the Riemann Hypothesis ( in
maxwellsci.com ) I had cause to remark that time to a particle or a
conjoined (or bonded) set of particles depends on distance (0r space) and
when space or distance gets to infinity so also is time and the zeta
function converges to zero. This makes the particle that has supersonic
speed to actually have the zero space orientation. This creates a
resolution (that I proposed) also for the computer science theory ( in
maxwellsci.com ). Well, I am only a school maths teacher; don't know much
physics, so I might just be thinking differently. Some guys told me no
particle would travel faster than light. I was then later excited when
neutrinos were recently found to have sped a bit faster then light speed -
thus pointing to the fact that supersonic speed of some particle is
possible.
Mike Atovigba.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <epistemology@googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM
Subject: [epistemology 12713] Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 2
Messages in 1 Topic
To: Digest Recipients <epistemology@googlegroups.com>


  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics

   - [epistemology 12709] Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 3
   Messages in 2 Topics
<#139c963c25574cf8_139b6923a0c479c0_group_thread_0>[2 Updates]

  [epistemology 12709] Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 3
Messages in 2 
Topics<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/5b6f53713d9702dd>

   Michael Atovigba <mikeatovi...@gmail.com> Sep 11 06:39AM -0700

   So from did the particles come to converge at a point to cause the big
   bang?
   Particles must have existed and occupied some space before embarking
   on a convergence.
   We may end up with ring theory or a chicken and egg metaphor.
   Did Big Bang create particles or particles converged and BigBanged?
   Mike Atovigba.





   Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> Sep 11 07:04AM -0700

   On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:55:16 AM UTC-4, garshagu wrote:
   > bang?
   > Particles must have existed and occupied some space before embarking
   > on a convergence.

   We may end up with ring theory or a chicken and egg metaphor.
   > Did Big Bang create particles or particles converged and BigBanged?

   I think neither. The Big Bang makes more sense if we turn it inside out.
   It
   is spacetime which shatters the singularity of mass-energy from the
   inside
   out, not an explosion of matter into an unexplained space. The
   appearance
   of particles is part of our naive realism because we ourselves are part
   of
   what I call the Big Diffraction. The Big Bang is not an event that
   happened
   within time and empty space, it is the hub of the wheel of time which
   creates space continuously, within itself. There was never anywhere for
   the
   singularity to Bang into, and there never will be. Space is the
   'illusion'.
   From an absolute perspective, space and time are only the nothingness
   which
   defines everythingness as somethingness.

   Craig






 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
epistemology.
You can post via email <epistemology@googlegroups.com>.
To unsubscribe from this group,
send<epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>an empty message.
For more options, visit
<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics>this group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to