Yeah, like all classical theory, thermodynamics etc. IMHO we need thinking that looks at open systems... My main beef with libertarians is that they are all talk and no action... Meanwhile the system is ...
On 3/13/2013 7:34 PM, archytas wrote: > Neoclasssical economics is closed-system - one might say closet. > Critique of this has gone on for more than a century these days > Michael Hudson, Steve Keen and many others. Veblen wanted to produce > it as an evolutionary science. The libertarians mostly claim our > problems all emerge from big government as this is inevitably corrupt > - so we'd have more freedom, democracy and even equality without it. > > On Mar 13, 4:34 pm, "Stephen P. King" <stephe...@charter.net> wrote: >> Hi Nom, >> >> Nice attempted pigeonhole. Nah, Freethinker, seeking of knowledge is >> more like what I am. I am trying to be able to shift from premise to >> premise, basis to basis and see the pro/con distributions and Nash >> equilibria of the various theories and visions. >> >> On 3/13/2013 12:02 PM, nominal9 wrote: > -- Onward! Stephen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
