http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-antimatter-gravity-cern-20130430,0,1126615.story

 By Eryn Brown 

April 30, 2013, 11:46 a.m.
 
Scientists have figured out a technique to measure gravity's effects on 
antimatter, that mysterious stuff so beloved of Dan Brown fans 
<http://angelsanddemons.web.cern.ch/antimatter>and physicists alike.

The achievement, made by the ALPHA collaboration <http://alpha.web.cern.ch/>at 
CERN's Large 
Hadron Collider 
<http://home.web.cern.ch/about/accelerators/large-hadron-collider>near 
Geneva, marks another step toward understanding the differences between 
ordinary matter and antimatter -- and perhaps, physicists hope, toward 
revealing more about the origins of the universe.

The scientists reported on their work Tuesday in the journal Nature 
Communications. <http://www.nature.com/ncomms/index.html>

Theorists think that ordinary matter and antimatter, which annihilate when 
they come into contact with each other, were generated in equal quantities 
during the Big Bang. But there must be some differences between the two 
types of matter, they also think, because otherwise matter and antimatter 
would have canceled each other out completely and there would be no 
universe.

Scientists at CERN are making atoms of antihydrogen to try to pin down what 
those differences might be.

But they're also willing to consider the possibility that the ideas were 
wrong in the first place, said Joel Fajans, a professor of physics at UC 
Berkeley and a member of the ALPHA team. For example, he said, theory 
suggests that the universe must be filled with dark matter and dark energy, 
but no one has seen either one.

"We think it's there, but it's almost an embarassment that we don't have 
evidence for it yet," Fajans said. "There's the faintest possibility that 
the theories are fundamentally wrong."

One way to change the theories and make them work would be to allow for 
antigravity.   

"People have dreamed of doing these experiments: Is it possible that 
antimatter falls upward instead of downward?" Fajans said. "Could an 
antimatter apple fall upward when it's close to the earth?"

The answer is probably no, he added. Indirect evidence suggests that 
gravity's effects are the same on matter and on antimatter. But gravity 
isn't especially well understood, so there could be "a window of 
opportunity for other strange things to happen," Fajans said.

The only way to find out for sure is to test gravity's effect on antimatter 
directly. That's where ALPHA comes in. The experiment uses strong magnets 
to trap antihydrogen 
atoms<http://articles.latimes.com/2010/nov/18/science/la-sci-trapped-antihydrogen-20101118>,
 
which are formed by combining an antiproton and a positron.  (For a great 
primer on how ATLAS works, check out this article by former Times staffer 
Thomas H. Maugh 
II<http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/06/science/la-sci-antimatter-20110606>. 
Fajans gave this lecture on the 
experiment<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sqYh8puZ-I>at Berkeley in 2009.)

According to Fajans and Jonathan Wurtele, another Berkeley physicist 
working on the project, no one had planned to measure gravitational effects 
with the current version of the experiment. But the scientists figured out 
a way to use measurements of 434 antihydrogen atoms and computer 
simulations to tease out some of gravity's very subtle effects. 

They can't yet tell if the particles fall up or down, said Fajans and 
Wurtele, but they were able to establish a range for antihydrogen's 
gravitational mass (that is, its mass measured by its gravitational 
attraction for other bodies).

It's not a level of precision that sheds a whole lot of light on the 
question of whether antigravity exists. But it's a promising step, Fajans 
said, because it demonstrates that scientists should be able to test 
gravity's effects on antimatter and learn more within a few years. Two new 
experiments at CERN, AEGIS and GBAR, are in the works.

The next version of the ALPHA experiment is already under construction and 
should also allow scientists to narrow the result -- with less precision, 
but on a "time scale of years, not decades," Fajans said. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to