Socrates, you posed: Why do cosmologists say: “Before Big Bang there was no time”? I m not a cosmologist. So I can't answer this question. My view is however, that: while attempting a resolution of Riemann Hypothesis in 2010 I realized time happens if there is space and there is motion from one point to another in that space. Before BigBang there were neither space nor movement, hence no time. Mike Atovigba
On 11/13/15, epistemology@googlegroups.com <epistemology@googlegroups.com> wrote: > ============================================================================= > Today's topic summary > ============================================================================= > > Group: epistemology@googlegroups.com > Url: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/epistemology/topics > > > - Big Bang: Time [1 Update] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/19fcc9001115d845 > - God particles, without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/ [1 Update] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/bfe200e34b472c26 > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: Big Bang: Time > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/19fcc9001115d845 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 1 ---------- > From: Sadovnik Socratus <i.socra...@yahoo.com> > Date: Nov 12 08:00AM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/9d3fde3eaa473 > > Big Bang: Time > > =. > > Big Bang is seriously taken by cosmologists and according > > to current cosmological scenarios: > > a) In the past, maybe 50 or 100 billion years ago, the Universe > > as whole reached its maximum radius. > > b) It took another 50 or 100 billion years when the Universe > > as whole came to singular point. > > c) Today we see the Universe at age 13,7 billion years. > > Question. > > Why do cosmologists say: “Before Big Bang there was no time”? > > ===.. > > Socratus. > > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: God particles, without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/ > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/bfe200e34b472c26 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 1 ---------- > From: Sadovnik Socratus <i.socra...@yahoo.com> > Date: Nov 12 08:02AM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/9d3fdd215bef5 > > God particles, without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/ > > ==.. > > To discover so-called God - particle ( Nobel Prize in 2013) > > was needed two conditions : deep vacuum and high energy. > > But if the vacuum were deeper and energy were higher then > > it would be possible to discover some kind of a new God – particles. > > Question: what is the deepest vacuum in the Universe? > > My answer: > > the deepest vacuum in the Universe is the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K. > > Question: what can be the highest energy? > > My answer: > > the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K continuum is itself some kind > > of infinite energy continuum. > > Using these parameters, I say that the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K > > can create primary God – particles and their names are > > "potential molar –masses (k) particles." > > ==.. > > Question: > > Why potential molar – masses (k) particles are primary God particles? > > Because: > > a) > > Heat is result of some kind of chaotic movements of particles. > > In thermodynamics the heat is explained by the formula: E=kT (logW) > > It means that chaotic movements of molar-mass (k) particles create heat. > > b) > > In 1905 Einstein wrote "quantum of action" as: h=kb > > It means that molar-mass (k) particles know some kind of another > > movement which can create "quantum of action" with energy E=(kb)*f. > > My conclusion. > > Without heat the Universe is an Absolute Cold Kingdom. > > Without "quantum of action" the Universe is dead continuum. > > The molar-mass (k) particles can take part in these two phenomenons: > > E=kT (logW) and E= (kb)*f. And therefore the molar-mass (k) > > particles are primary elements from the First Instant (T=0K) of the > > Universe’s creation. Not " the famous Higgs Boson" (with the low > > energy and prestige Prize) but the old and modest well-known > > molar-mass k-particles are real "God particles" > > # > > k-particles have two forms of modifications: as a heat E=kT (logW) > > and as an energy E=(kb)*f . The interaction between energy and heat > > created everything in the Universe but . . . . but until today nobody > > explained the interaction between E= (kb)*f and E=kT (logW). > > =====…. > > Best wishes. > > Israel Sadovnik Socratus. > > ========…. > > > > > > > -- > You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this > group. You can change your settings on the group membership page: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/epistemology/join > . > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an > email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
