Great education! Atovigba. On 11/17/15, epistemology@googlegroups.com <epistemology@googlegroups.com> wrote: > ============================================================================= > Today's topic summary > ============================================================================= > > Group: epistemology@googlegroups.com > Url: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/epistemology/topics > > > - The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/ [1 Update] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/595c4e92afe81748 > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/ > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/595c4e92afe81748 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 1 ---------- > From: Sadovnik Socratus <i.socra...@yahoo.com> > Date: Nov 16 10:32PM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/b1e618a896e56 > > The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/ > > ===… > > Scenario number one: Big Bang. > > At t=0 moment of BB: > > a) the temperature was infinite (go to infinite) > > b) the density was infinite. (go to infinite) > > c) the volume was zero (go to zero) > > d) BB reached a boundary to spacetime itself. > > e) here the laws of physics break down. > > f) today BB is prestige cosmological scenario. > > # > > Scenario number two: Zero Vacuum. > > a) the temperature is T=0K (the boundary of heat) > > b) the density is infinite (we cannot reach T=0K and its density). > > c) the volume is infinite but the volume of its quantum particles > > are zero (according to Jacques Charles’ law > > (and the consequence of the third law of thermodynamics ) > > d) zero vacuum is the boundary to gravity-space and gravity-time. > > e) here the laws of physics (Ideal gas, QED, SRT, . . etc.) are worked.(!) > > f) today scientific community obeys taboo: > > no explanation beyond zero vacuum point. . . . . . . > > . . . ‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we > cannot > > reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not > > sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero > > simple have no meaning.’ > > Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ , Page 138. > > by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 / > > # > > Question: Does zero vacuum really have no meaning? > > My opinion. > > The T=0K is boundary between two (2) worlds: Material and Vacuum. > > Beyond/below T=0K is Kingdom of negative virtual antiparticles: -E=Mc^2. > > The symmetrical continuum of T=0K ( in its local places) can be broken by > > antiparticles through entropy, HUP, quantum fluctuation, quantum tunneling, > > ==========… > > Best wishes. > > Israel Sadovnik. > > =======. > > > > > > > -- > You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this > group. You can change your settings on the group membership page: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/epistemology/join > . > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an > email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
