Book: Quantum Enigma, 2006, by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner. --- My comment For most physicists quantum mechanics is not enigma. Most physicists tend to be pragmatists and use their macroscopic equipment to solve concrete, practical problem. They say: ''If it works, it's true.'' and deeper meaning doesn't need. --- But the authors Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner (and few other authors) called the QM '' . . . shocking, ridiculous, crazy, strange, hard to accept, make no sense . . . . etc ) . . . from philosophical view . . . when they tried to understand the nature of the microworld (wave-particle duality, quantum jumps, wavefunction collapses, . . . etc) --- In my opinion, if we have the real model of quantum particle then the QM can be understood from philosophical view. # We cannot see a single Planck's (h) , or single Boltzmann's (k), or a single Einstein's ( E = mc^2 ) but having true model of quantum particle and thanks to mathematics and human's logic we can understand how microworld can work. =======
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/epistemology/b4df40de-ad4f-4fd3-b08d-f8e75086766d%40googlegroups.com.
