The option to enable signed bundles in 3.3 is osgi.support.signature.verify (notice "support" and "signature" are reversed). In 3.4 we are introducing a more general option called osgi.signedcontent.support which does not have simple true|false options, but we will continue to recognize the old 3.3. option. Matt is documenting the security options in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=217765
The internal security manager class is needed to fully support postponed conditions in ConditionalPermissionAdmin. If postponed conditions are not needed then simply enabling the security manager with -Djava.security.policy="" will enable the built-in security manager which will satisfy most needs. There is an option called eclipse.security. This option is used by the launcher jar to setup a policy to grant the framework and the launcher AllPermissions and specify the security manager to use. Unfortunately this still requires a reference to an internal class if you want to load a security manager to support postponed conditions. I've opened a bug to investigate making this easier. Perhaps eclipse.security manager can have a value that indicates the framework should load its internal security manager. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=218001. Tom From: Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org> Date: 02/06/2008 07:47 AM Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Signed bundles Marcel Offermans wrote: > So, reiterating, if I want to run Equinox with OSGi security enabled > and have it use my own keystore, I have to start it like this > (formatted a bit for clarity, but typed as one big line): > > java > -Djava.security.manager=org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.FrameworkSecurityManager > -Djava.security.policy=policy > -Dosgi.framework.keystore=keystore > -Dosgi.signature.support.verify=true > -jar org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.0.v20071207.jar > -console > -consoleLog > > Basically, I'm asking how Equinox is being run to be compliant with > OSGi security. Is the above line accurate? Seems complicated and requires people to reference internal classes etc. Could be wrong but I remember it being simipler Jeff _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
