Yes, this was discussed on Monday and we agreed the bug was a must fix and the small API was required.
Tom
|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Pascal Rapicault <pas...@sonatype.com>
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|04/11/2010 07:31 PM
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Done.
On 2010-04-11, at 6:44 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
> Great. I did not recall this as one of the approved ones. Would be good
to note that in the bug for consistency and transparency.
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 2010-04-11, at 4:15 PM, Pascal Rapicault <pas...@sonatype.com> wrote:
>
>> During last week team meeting, we went through all the API bugs to
discuss as a team their relevance, impact, and get a verbal approval from
the PMC thus streamlining the release of the API for all parties involved.
>> This particular bug was part of this discussion, and it needs to be
noted that it represents a loss of functionality over what we had in the
past.
>>
>> On 2010-04-11, at 2:51 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall a API change proposal or approval for this. The bug
cited does have the API keyword but no approvals AFAICT. Was that done
somewhere else?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2010-04-09, at 8:52 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
>>>
>>>> In order to address bug 303990 - metarequirement seems broken, I have
had to add two new constants in the IProvisioningAgent INSTALLER_AGENT and
INSTALLER_PROFILEID.
>>>> This was a necessity because otherwise the director application was
not able to install metarequirements.
>>>>
>>>> PaScaL_______________________________________________
>>>> equinox-dev mailing list
>>>> equinox-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> equinox-dev mailing list
>>> equinox-dev@eclipse.org
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> equinox-dev mailing list
>> equinox-dev@eclipse.org
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
