----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----


All:

FWIW, found this on Chevron's Web site after last post RE: Autogas.

"Most World War I fuels had a lean-mixture rating in the 50- to 70-octane number range..."

Hmmm...so by World War I, which began in Europe 11 years after Kittyhawk, the octane was in the 50-70 range for lean-mixture.

Chevron site is:

http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuels/bulletin/aviationfuel/12_aircraft_piston_engines.shtm#enginedev

Still wondering what quality was available in '03 and if it was much different from the WWI 50-70 octane of 11 years later.

Curioser and curioser.


Steve


----------------------------------
  Steve Greenhow
  Austin, Texas USA
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.realtime.net/~magbo/
  (nom de plume "Downwind Jaxon")
----------------------------------



Downwind Jaxon wrote:
All:

The mogas discussion here gives me reason to post a subject upon which I have ruminated recently, following all the hubub last month and last year about the Centennial of Powered Flight.

What sort of gasoline would have been available to the Wright Brothers? Wouldn't think it was too sophisticated by today's standards, or even that the petroleum would have much of a gasoline market in 1903. That grew enormously within just a decade of course, but in '03, it seems the gasoline product line would have been pretty limited, without much customer demand to drive it (pun intended).

Any ideas where to track down what gasoline was available to the Wrights in late 1903 on the then-isolated North Carolina coast?

There is a ton of data, books, articles, etc., on much of what they did, but outside of mentions in several sources that the Wrights built the engine for the '03 Flyer completely from scratch and that it used gasoline, can't find much about it.

Thought maybe someone on the list might know.

regards,
Steve
----------------------------------
  Steve Greenhow
  Austin, Texas USA
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.realtime.net/~magbo/
  (nom de plume "Downwind Jaxon")
----------------------------------
Ercoupe Hangar Flying wrote:
From: "R M Finch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ercoupe Hangar Flying'" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "R M Finch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [COUPERS-FLYIN] RE: Autogas

[Some more info from a flying buddy]

Some good information and some outdated information.  I've been following
the mogas issue very closely.

Gasoline of today is a better quality of gas than days of past.  The 'slime'
or 'varnish' discussion portion of this email is correct. However, with the
advent automotive fuel injected engines, gasoline has become much cleaner
since manufacturers are simply reacting to the needs of sensitive automotive
fuel injection systems.  The fuel injection system on your Toyota Camry is
infinitely more complex and sensitive to lousy gas as opposed to an aircraft
engine which is based on 1940's technology.

On a side note, the lead used in 100LL is quite a bit different than the
type of lead used in the past.  Apparently the lead in 100LL not only fouls
plugs but is quite corrosive to internal engine parts.

And finally, I defer to Kit (the guru of aviation) who uses mogas in his
Midget Mustang.  Our biggest problem is now addition ethanol in mogas. We've
been purchasing our gas in Fairfield since they are exempt from the ethanol
requirement.

Bob


----------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected] (Ercoupe Hangar Flying)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: Digest list: Ercoupe Hangar Flying

I use nothing but 100LL in my 90 HP engine (no 80 available )and find large quanties of water every time I drain the sumps.  Does't matter if I check after the plane sits for extended period or I check it after refueling during a flight.  Can't figure out wherr it all is coming from
Bob Bullock
N5621F
Maryland

----------------------------
From: "Dick Chevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ercoupe Hangar Flying" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Dick Chevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: Digest list: Ercoupe Hangar Flying

I never get water in my sumps, regardless of the fuel used.  The humidity in
NM is typically 15% or less.  In Md it's probably 85% most of the time.
Perhaps that's the answer.
Dick in sunny and dry NM.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ercoupe Hangar Flying" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 8:23 PM
Subject: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: Digest list: Ercoupe Hangar Flying


  
----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
    
advice in this forum.]----
  
I use nothing but 100LL in my 90 HP engine (no 80 available )and find
    
large quanties of water every time I drain the sumps.  Does't matter if I
check after the plane sits for extended period or I check it after refueling
during a flight.  Can't figure out wherr it all is coming from
  
Bob Bullock
N5621F
Maryland

    
============================================================================
==
  
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/


----------------------------
From: "John Barsness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "John Barsness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: Digest list: Ercoupe Hangar Flying

I don't get any in Idaho either.  Water, I mean.  :-)

Sgt. John Barsness
Boise Airport Police
3201 Airport Way
Boise, ID  83705
(208) 424-5620

    
"Dick Chevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/27/04 09:24PM >>>
        
----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
any advice in this forum.]----


I never get water in my sumps, regardless of the fuel used.  The
humidity in
NM is typically 15% or less.  In Md it's probably 85% most of the
time.
Perhaps that's the answer.
Dick in sunny and dry NM.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ercoupe Hangar Flying" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 8:23 PM
Subject: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: Digest list: Ercoupe Hangar Flying


  
----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
    
any
advice in this forum.]----
  
I use nothing but 100LL in my 90 HP engine (no 80 available )and
    
find
large quanties of water every time I drain the sumps.  Does't matter if
I
check after the plane sits for extended period or I check it after
refueling
during a flight.  Can't figure out wherr it all is coming from
  
Bob Bullock
N5621F
Maryland
    

-- 

==============================================================================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/



Reply via email to