Group:  We have just finished a major rebuild of 415-CD #4787, N94676 airframe. 
 Restoration work was accomplished by a highly experienced team composed of an 
AP and an AP/IA. The C-85-F engine was majored just prior to my purchase and 
fitted with the 0-200 modification.  Currently, TTSM is 28.6 hrs. As part of 
the  rebuild, the fuel plumbing system was replaced due to use of unauthorized 
components an unworkable plumbing configuration.   The new system follows the 
configuration shown in Figure 34 of the Ercoupe Service Manual.  All tanks are 
vented with serviceable gaskets.  The orifice input fitting at the fuel pump 
was measured at .062".  During post rebuild flight tests, it was discovered 
that, although fuel was being pumped from both wing tanks, the flow rate was 
insufficient to fully replenish the fuel drawn from the header tank.  This was 
particularly true with the fuel burn rate experienced during touch and go 
landings.  

 

We did not receive any engine performance data on the C-85-0200 engine with the 
airplane.  Fuel consumption data for the C-90 is appreciably higher than for 
the C-85. Assuming the C-85-0200 is reasonably approximated by the C-90 fuel 
consumption at various power levels, it occurred that the header tank fuel 
replenishment rate for the C-85-0200 may be higher than that allowed by the 
current orifice in the fuel pump of .062".   So far, we haven't been able to 
find data on the required orifice for the C-90 or 0200 Continental engines.  

 

First, can anyone provide fuel consumption data for the C-85-0200 engine?  Is 
the C-90 a reasonable approximation?   Is the restriction orifice of .062" 
adequate for this engine modification, or should it be relieved? If so, by how 
much?    The fuel system IS  transferring fuel from the wing tanks to the 
header tank, but the fuel transfer rate seems to be insufficient.  I am 
concerned that a fuel burn rate resulting from a long climb at full power would 
deplete the fuel from the header tank to an extent it would take an 
inordinately long time at cruise to replenish.  We would greatly appreciate any 
insights, experiences, or  recommendations that might be offered.

 

Thanks to all.

 

Bob Blanchard, Owner/Pilot

N94676

 

 

Reply via email to