Steve,
No peril here.  Most of us are just normal humans.  We welcome newcomers and 
their experience.  When one can't learn anymore they are educated beyound their 
intelligence.  Some folks are normally pessimestic on most issues, then there 
are usens who look toward the favorable and what is in the best interest of the 
group.
In my humble opinion, there would be no lawsuits and probably no thought in 
that direction by the majority of members of this group.  The provision of 
information by any one member for the benefit of all others would just be 
appreciated and used to the best benefit of their aeroplanes.  Should anyone 
initiate a lawsuit against some person who tried to help all of us and got sued 
by a base person, I will be(probably one of many) who will send a check to 
support that person in the fight against the low person who would initiate such 
a suit.  The data that has been researched was accumulated from documents 
readily available from other sources.  It is raw data to be used as one see fit 
and is not provided as a technical document just an consolidated data or an 
instrument of instruction.   
The issue here is a member has done a tremendous amount of work that would be 
very valuable to all members should they be able to acquire said info.  The 
person doing the work, did it with the intent of assisting others more so than 
making money.  It is my humble opinion that all the data could be disseminated 
without the possibility of any idiotic law suits.  That being said, there may 
be some attorneys that can find a reason to sue anyone for anything just to get 
more money.  I have seen it here where I live as there are some who are willing 
to sacrifice their integrity (if they have any) for a few dollars.

Most of us are here to learn and help each other.  We disagree at times, but 
who doesn't?  So long as disagreements are kept civil, much is learned about 
the subject and individuals in the disagreement.
Welcome and tune in anytime.

Lee Browning
> > > A.D.s ##___, and SB # _____ ?"
> > >
> > > Linda
> > >
> > > Paul Anton wrote:
> > >
> > > Ad 81-07-06 Paragraph (3)e specifies both gaskets are to be 
> > > replaced and
> > > torque of 30 +- 5 inch pounds
>



Pizzo Stephenhttp://www.stephen.pizzo.com"Never do anything you don't want to 
have to explain to the paramedics."

____________________________________________________________
1 Tip for Losing Weight
Cut down 2 lbs per week by using this 1 weird old tip
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4c853d23b8c0ea24bc4st05duc

Reply via email to