On Friday 19 August 2011 21:31:46 Detlev Offenbach wrote: > On Freitag, 19. August 2011, Algis Kabaila wrote: > > Hi Detlev, > > > > The attached script shows how a required file is marked as unused with a > > warning. The warning is > > > > Warning: "qrc_hi" imported but unused. > > > > However, in line 27 of hi.py the qrc_hi is used, though the reference to > > it is indirect and in a rather obscure format. I attach the script > > hi.py, hi.qrc, hi.ui and an icon from a small collection of icons, to > > enable an independent verification. The XML file hi.qrc shows how the > > "document-new.png" fits in the small package of icons. > > > > The debugger check of unused files and variables has proved itself > > extremely useful, at least for me - I was really surprised how many times > > I had unused variables and files - thank you for such a useful facility! > > > > Regards, > > Al. > > Hi, > > due to the fact, that the magic of Qt resource scripts is activated by > purely importing them, the checker sees this situation as an unused > import. There is no way (known to me) how to recognize this situation. > However, if you mark the import with a comment of "# __IGNORE_WARNING__", > the warning provided by pyflakes for the "unused" import will be ignored. > With this comment one can suppress false warnings everywhere in the code. > This special comment must be in the line to be ignored. > > Regards, > Detlev
Hi, Thank you for a constructive answer. I accept your answer without reservation - I agree that the resources in Qt are a bit of magic... The ignore warning "comment" is a good solution as long as it applies only to the next warning. I would not want to loose the warnings completely as I am fond of them! Regards, Al. _______________________________________________ Eric mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/eric
