Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 12:58:46 -0400From: cjwilliams43@gmail.comTo: studio-pm@hotmail.comSubject: Re: [Eric] Again about: Eric(5) tools On 02/11/2013 12:06 PM, Pietro Moras wrote: > how basic Dear Colin, By design cx_Freeze can be used at three levels, three different ways: 1/3) At basic “cxfreeze” level (by the way, it's how it's currently embedded in Eric); 2/3) By means of custom cx-Distutils-like “setup.py” scripts; 3/3) By means of direct use of cx_Freeze modules library.- It was my first choice to investigate the “setup.py” script way, and I found it: – Messy – “Unripe” – Unsupported So that I gave it up. Anyhow I would be happy to change my mind if cx_Freeze people gave me sound reasons to; so far they didn't... That said, I'll be also glad to further discuss this topic with you, in case you're interested. All the best. - P.M. Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:34:34 -0400 From: cjwilliam...@gmail.com To: studio...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Eric] Again about: Eric(5) tools On 02/11/2013 8:26 AM, Pietro Moras wrote: I'd welcome your thoughts, remarks and proposals about this list of Eric(5) tools as currently chosen to be Test & Documented next 2014, in order of preference: – Mecurial VCS – Set of “plugins” – “cxfreeze” (basic use of cx_Freeze, only) – Revision/updating of one of the existing Eric Tech.Reports.- For the final choice I'd welcome your thoughts, remarks and proposals. Thank you. - P.M. _______________________________________________ Eric mailing list Eric@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/eric
I would suggest cx_freeze, depending on how basic Colin W. Thanks. Most packages seem to be available in the Windows binary form. It appears that cx_freeze is potentially helpful for other packages. I don't wish to pursue the matter, thanks. Colin W.
_______________________________________________ Eric mailing list Eric@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/eric