From: Donald Eastlake 3rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:57:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [interest] FWD: Was the Antikythera an Ancient Instrument for
Longitude Determination?


<http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/Spring03/Antikythera.html>

Was the Antikythera an Ancient Instrument for Longitude Determination?
by Richard Sanders

In the wake of our work on the torquetum [See Rick Sanders, "Ancient
Navigators Could Have Measured Longitude!"  and Bertram Cooper,
"Building and Using Maui's Tanawa, 21st Century, Fall 2001, pp. 58-65.],
there has been renewed interest in ancient, or not so ancent,
astronomical instruments. Henry Aujard in France recently brought to our
attention one of the most important archaeological finds of the 20th
Century (or perhaps of modern times): a very intricate, bronze, geared
instrument, known as an antikythera, which dates from around 80 B.C.
Fragments of the instrument were found in a large shipwreck on the sea
floor off the coast of Greece in 1900, by sponge fishers. (See Figure
1.) It is unlike anything else that has been passed down to us, in terms
of the intricacy of its more than 30 gears. (We do have a geared
astrolabe, but it is from about 1,000 years later!).

The antikythera was studied over the years, but the breakthrough came
when Derek de Solla Price, a professor of the history of science at Yale
University, was able to use gamma-radiography in 1972 to look at the
fragments in intricate detail. He presented his analysis in a 1974
article published by the American Philosophical Society ["Gears from the
Greeks," Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (New
Series), Volume 64, Part 7, 1974, pp. 1-70.], whose study we have just
begun. We are writing this communication to urge others to also study
the 1974 work.
 
Figure 1
THE ISLAND OF ANTIKYTHERA
<http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/Spring03/RC1.fig1.jpg>
Location of the wreck, near an island between Kythera and Crete, from
which the antikythera fragments were salvaged.

De Solla Price must be commended for his scrupulous attempts to decipher
the significance of the ratios of the gears, as involving the relative
motions of the Sun and the Moon, including the Metonic cycle (in which
19 solar years correspond exactly with 235 lunations). But the
outstanding question that, to our knowledge (and we hope to be wrong),
no one has asked is: Why would anyone want to fool with the Moon? It is
the same question which we confronted in our hypotheses about the
torquetum.

So, let us exclude Moon worshippers and religious rituals as
explanation. Otherwise, the Moon is useful for tidal information, and
for telling fishermen when the fish are biting, but such information
does not justify a "Mount Palomar" instrument such as the antikythera,
which, after all, was being carried on a ship.
   
Figure 2
DIAGRAM OF THE ANTIKYTHERA GEARING SYSTEM
<http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/Spring03/RC1.fig2.jpg>
De Solla Price's diagram of the antikythera's complete gearing system.
   
The only reasons for a sailor/navigator to mess with the Moon is to
predict eclipses (for finding longitude), and to forecast lunar
distances (to find longitude). As we pointed out in the article on the
torquetum, if you are using the Moon to determine longitude, you must
have with you a book of tables, in which the position of the Moon (for a
point of reference), would be given relative to various stars,
preferably over 19 years.

The advantage of a geared mechanism, which would have to be set, or be
settable, for a given longitude (that is, reference place), would be
that you could dispense with the tables. All you would have to do is
crank the handle for the number of days since you left port, and that
would give you the longitude of the Moon for that day, for your home
base, or place of reference. Then, you could measure the Moon's position
relative to some appropriate bright star, and you would know your
longitude.

We are putting out this communication to provoke discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

  De Solla Price on "Gears from the Greek"

Excerpted, with permission, from Derek de Solla Price, "Gears from the
Greeks," Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (New
Series), Volume 64, Part 7, 1974.

"It seems that the function of the turntable must be to take these two
rates of revolution, one annual and the other approximately monthly, and
compound them either as a sum or a difference. The two obvious and
almost inescapable astronomical choices would be associated with the
fact that the synodic motion of the Moon -- the cycle of the phases from
New Moon to Full Moon -- is the difference between the sidereal motions
of the Sun and of the Moon against the backdrop of the fixed stars. The
Sun appears to rotate through the stars of the zodiac in about 365 days,
while the Moon changes place in a period of about 27-1/3 days, and
changes through its cycle of phases in about 29-1/2 days.

"Either the differential turntable adds the revolutions of the Sun to
those of the synodic phenomena, to produce the revolutions of the Moon,
or it subtracts the revolutions of the Sun from those of the Moon to
produce the cycles of the synodic months. From the fact that B3 and B4
rotate in opposite directions (and so therefore do E1 and E2) it follows
that it is the latter case which applies. This is confirmed by the gear
ratios . . . which introduce numbers compatible with the classical Greek
calendrical device of the Metonic cycle, in which 19 solar years are
made to correspond exactly with 235 lunations, and therefore with 254
sidereal revolutions of the Moon. The gearing contains wheels that
correspond very well with the prime numbers 19 and 127 which are needed
to mechanize the Metonic cycle. We have in fact 64/383 48/243 127/32 =
254/19, so that the differential gear is fed with 254 revolutions of E2
and 19 reverse revolutions of E1. For every 19 (direct) turns of the
main drive wheel; this produces 2,356/2 revolutions of the whole
differential turntable and all the gears mounted upon it."


Reply via email to