On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea here is good but I'm not at all a fan of the implementation. First > off, no way should we be choosing a specific stats collection protocol. > They're just too specific to a particular operations/infra configuration > that anything we pick is going to be inadequate for a non trivial number of > users. > > OTOH, I think it would be a very good idea to sit down and design the stats > API to be pluggable. We already have two rough sides to the API (collection > vs reporting). If we sat down and designed a collection API that would then > talk to a configurable reporting API it'd allow for users to do a number of > cool things with stats. > >
agree. - benoît
