On 09/26/11 at 11:00pm, Jordan Wilberding wrote:
> Sure man. I left it in a bit of a mess, so let me regroup and see exactly
> what is left on the code.
>

No problem. We should be basing this probably off my latest master,
with the move to term based configs and the split of config and state
thats going to affect you quite a bit. You might want to take a look
there.

I am more then willing to take a look at the code.

On a side note, with the latest escript based distribution shell
doesn't work (the model has changed quite a lot) we need to take a
look at that.

I also noticed that the test task isn't discovering tests for some
reason. Thats an easy fix and I will get on that this afternoon.

The escript stuff is the hardest fix, I am not actually sure how to
resolve that.

here are the issues
 - With escript we don't have access to the startup environment for
 erlang. That means we cannot pass remove the -noshell flag. In any
 case, escript shuts down when things are done running.
- We can startup a shell internally like we used to, but we will loose
the nice terminal features of the usual shell (this is probably the
short term solution).
- we can exec another erlang with the right paths, but there is a lot
of ambiguity there around execing the right erlang with the right erts
etc.

I have short term solution, but no long term solution as yet. Ideas?


> Thanks!
> JW
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > Jordan,
> >
> >  One of things I think is really critical to the 2.0 release is
> > dialyzer support. I know you did some work there and ended up making a
> > patch to dialyzer itself. However, we also talked about some work
> > around to make dialyzer work in the near term. It would be very, very
> > good to do those work around and get the task back in place. If you
> > aren't terribly interested could you push your interim work somewhere
> > where I can pick it up?
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "erlware-dev" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "erlware-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to