What is the difference between returning this:
["SomeString",
{ewc,...},
[<<"Some">,["IO","List"]]]
And this:
{data,["SomeString",
{ewc,...},
[<<"Some">,["IO","List"]]]}
(Other than that the latter doesn't work.) In either case, a view
function like this should work:
<%@ view([FirstString,RenderedComponent,SomeOtherString]) %>
...
The problem is that I can't always just return a {data} tuple or a
[{ewc}] list, I have to differentiate between one that includes
rendered components and one that doesn't, and I worry that the
"detection" between the two may fail when I mix them (for instance,
maybe I want to render a page with a title and a list of items; the
title is a literal string, but the items are rendered {ewc}s). Am I
missing an overarching design that requires a difference between
passing a view function a list of rendered components and a list of
iolists? Is there any way that we can get {data} to look at its
arguments and see if they are {ewc}s, and render them just like it
would if I returned a [{ewc}], so that I can always return a {data}?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"erlyweb" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
