> I think a redesign definitely is in order -- also, maybe consider > renaming the project? I've never liked the name erlyweb, it just > sounds kind of gross. Unfortunately aesthetics is definitely > something people take into consideration when discovering new things. > Although it might not be important to a lot of us, just look at rails, > django, spring, etc. Nicer looking websites, better sounding names. > Just a thought.
The name is fine; it's an erlang web framework, and that's clear from the name. If you totally rewrote and renamed it, it wouldn't be erlyweb anyway, so feel free to do so, choice in the web framework area is always good. But please leave erlyweb alone. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
