What kind of package are we talking about? A tarball with some makefile magic to make the build/install easier? Or something more comprehensive? If it's a tarball and makefile combo, I'd be willing to put that together.
--Kevin On Jan 1, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Simon Chappell wrote: > > I agree that compiling is simple, but it's still an extra step. How > hard would it be to create a new users package containing Yaws and > ErlyWeb? > > I suspect (no data to back this up, except my own experience and the > tone of various conversations that I've followed on the 'net) that > most potential new users are lost by projects over non-simple > installation and lack of good starter tutorials. > > I am trying to help with the document part, can any of you clever > folks out there create a Yaws/ErlyWeb combined package? Are there > other ways to ease the install? > > Simon > > > On Jan 1, 2008 1:47 PM, Kevin A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> If that's the case, should we think about including yaws with erlyweb >> releases? Seems like that would help new people get over the hump. >> >> --Kevin >> >> On Jan 1, 2008, at 2:26 PM, David King wrote: >> >>> >>>> Given the fact that ErlyWeb is compiled against a specific >>>> version of >>>> Yaws, it seems like it would be useful to record which versions of >>>> it's dependencies each release needs. >>> >>> You might be better off just compiling it (it's pretty simple) than >>> trying to track all of that >>> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >> > > > > -- > simonpeter.org | simonpeter.com | newlife-upc.org | > wisconsindistrictnews.org > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
